Harvester's parent, Mitchells & Butlers, has SBTi-validated net-zero targets and renewable electricity across 1,726 sites, but absolute emissions progress is modest at 16% towards a 2040 goal. Critical gaps: no water strategy despite significant consumption, weak biodiversity disclosure, and Scope 3 targets below 1.5°C alignment. Waste and energy programmes are solid but do not offset weak supply chain and nature accountability.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Targets & Commitments and Controversies & Red Flags (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (3/10, 3/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 46 major food service / restaurants brands we've scored, Harvester sits 3rd of 46.
Score history begins 9 April 2026.
As Harvester's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Harvester is a pub-restaurant chain owned by Mitchels & Butlers plc, a FTSE-listed hospitality operator with ~1,726 sites across the UK and Ireland. Known for carvery-style dining, Harvester is part of a larger estate including pubs, bars, and casual dining brands serving millions of customers annually.
Large multi-site casual dining operator with renewable energy targets; weaker biodiversity and water disclosure.
View breakdown →UK casual dining chain; similar scale and transparency challenges on supply chain emissions and nature risk.
View breakdown →Partner in Harvester's food waste programme; emblematic of incremental reduction strategy versus systemic change.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.