Fortescue reports detailed emissions data and has ambitious 2030/2040 decarbonisation targets backed by US$6.2B investment and major equipment orders. However, absolute emissions have risen, not fallen. Core weaknesses: negligible progress on Scope 1+2 reduction, severe biodiversity and water disclosure gaps, and unresolved Yindjibarndi indigenous rights dispute over 249 destroyed heritage sites.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Resource Use & Waste (3/10, 3/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
8 of 12 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 10 major mining & extraction brands we've scored, Fortescue sits 3rd of 10.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As Fortescue's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Fortescue Metals Group is Australia's second-largest iron ore producer, extracting ~190Mt annually from the Pilbara region. Founded in 1976 and headquartered in Perth, it supplies global steelmakers and is transitioning its fleet to renewable energy and battery-electric equipment by 2030.
Peer diversified miner with similar scale, decarbonisation pledges, and indigenous rights tensions.
View breakdown →Comparable iron ore and diversified commodities producer; contrasting governance and indigenous engagement track record.
View breakdown →Large-scale mining and commodity trading firm with higher ESG governance and disclosure baseline.
View breakdown →Gold major with stronger biodiversity and water management disclosure; emissions trajectory comparison.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.