Natura &Co Holding·FMCG / Consumer Goods·São Paulo, Brazil·Founded 1969·Last verified 31 May 2026
46
out of 100
Making progressPending Review

Natura &Co demonstrates strong biodiversity leadership and transparent climate accountability, having exceeded its 2030 Scope 1&2 target early. Weaknesses: supply chain carbon lacks quantified Scope 3 data, renewable energy sourcing unverified, water and waste metrics absent from current reporting.

The calculation

Every score shows its working.

Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
FMCG / Consumer Goods sector ceiling.
30 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the 10 rubric questions, scored 0–10 each.
67 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 30) + (0.7 × 67) = 55.9
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on absolute emissions volume — physics-first.
× 0.82
Final score
Rounded. Making progress.
46 / 100
The ten questions

Where Natura &Co Holding is strong, and where it isn't.

Strongest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Transparency & Accountability (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Energy Source (5/10, 5/10).

Where the evidence comes from

Every document used, listed.

10 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.

[1]Self-reported
2024 Integrated Annual Report
2024
Q1Q3Q4Q5Q6Q8Q9
View →
[2]Self-reported
2024 Integrated Annual Report — Our Reporting Practices
2024
Q1Q9
View →
[3]Self-reported
2023 Integrated Annual Report — Sustainability Vision
2023
Q2Q6
View →
[4]Self-reported
2023 Integrated Annual Report — Biodiversity and Deforestation
2023
Q5
View →
[5]Self-reported
2024 Integrated Annual Report — Commitment to Life
2024
Q5Q6
View →
[6]Third-party verified
Case Study: Natura &Co IP&L, Circular Carbon, and Triple Bottom Line Approach
Unknown
Q2Q8Q9
View →
[7]Third-party verified
Water Footprint Assessment of Natura Cosmetics Products
2013
Q7
View →
[8]Public record
Natura Cosmeticos Gets Sustainability Makeover
Unknown
Q7
View →
[9]Public record
Cosmetics Design — Latam Drives Q1 2025 Growth for Natura &Co
2025
Q10
View →
[10]Third-party verified
Sustainalytics ESG Rating — Natura &Co Holding
Unknown
Q10
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

Natura &Co Holding in context

Where Natura &Co Holding sits among fmcg / consumer goods peers.

Among the 41 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Natura &Co Holding is tied =8th of 41, with 1 other.

=8/41
Natura &Co Holding's rank
40
Industry average
23
Industry low
56
Industry high
How this score has moved

Natura &Co Holding's score over time.

today

Score history begins 5 April 2026.

As Natura &Co Holding's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.

We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.

What's being contested

This score is not currently being contested.

Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.

No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.

About Natura &Co Holding

Natura &Co is a Brazilian cosmetics and personal care company founded in 1969, headquartered in São Paulo. The world's largest B Corp, it operates across Latin America, North America, and Europe through brands including Natura, Avon, and The Body Shop. The company integrates Amazon sourcing and socio-biodiversity into its core business model.

Founded
1969
Headquarters
São Paulo, Brazil
Employees
~35,000
Annual revenue
~BRL 24.1B (~$4.5B USD)
Company website ↗
Track Natura &Co Holding

We'll let you know when the score moves.

Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.

THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

HOW SINK STAYS INDEPENDENT

Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.