Neal's Yard Remedies demonstrates genuine operational sustainability—renewable energy, organic sourcing, biodiversity advocacy—but relies on carbon offsets rather than absolute emissions reductions and publishes no quantified footprint data. Intensity-only targets, missing Scope 3 disclosure, and no formal ESG reporting undermine credibility despite third-party certifications and strong governance intent.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Energy Source and Controversies & Red Flags (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Targets & Commitments and Emissions Trajectory (3/10, 3/10).
11 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 41 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Neal's Yard Remedies sits 7th of 41.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As Neal's Yard Remedies's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Neal's Yard Remedies is a UK-based organic personal care and wellness brand founded in 1976, headquartered in Peacemarsh, Dorset. Family-owned, it manufactures small-batch skincare, herbal remedies, and supplements using certified organic ingredients, selling through 70+ retail outlets and e-commerce. Known for sustainability positioning and natural product formulation within the premium FMCG sector.
Peer organic personal care brand; comparable scale, similar certification density, but stronger absolute emissions reporting.
View breakdown →Larger natural beauty competitor; acquired by Natura, stronger ESG governance, but criticised for greenwashing claims.
View breakdown →Direct competitor in ethical beauty; stronger supply chain transparency, but also lacks absolute emissions disclosure.
View breakdown →UK organic herbal brand; similar values-driven positioning, comparable scale, relevant peer for sustainability transition benchmark.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.