General Mills reports comprehensively on Scope 1 and 2 emissions with third-party verification and has nearly reached 100% renewable electricity. But Scope 3 dominates its footprint and transparency here collapses: no published FLAG baseline, no pesticide monitoring among regenerative suppliers, and a stalled packaging recycling rate. The company is on track for near-term SBTi targets but the hardest work—agricultural emissions reduction—remains largely unverified.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (5/10, 5/10).
14 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
7 of 14 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 41 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, General Mills is tied =14th of 41, with 3 others.
Score history begins 11 April 2026.
As General Mills's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
General Mills is a Minneapolis-based food manufacturer and packaged goods company founded in 1866, generating $19 billion in annual revenue. It operates globally across cereals, snacks, pet food, and yogurt. The company sits in the mid-tier of large FMCG peers on climate transparency but faces typical food sector challenges: supply chain emissions dependency and land-use accountability gaps.
Peer multinational food conglomerate; similar Scope 3 transparency gaps and regenerative ag claims needing verification
View breakdown →Direct packaged food competitor; comparable scale, renewable energy targets, and agricultural supply chain risk exposure
View breakdown →FMCG peer with stronger TNFD disclosure and earlier net-zero commitments; contrasts on biodiversity accountability
View breakdown →Food sector peer with B Corp ethos; demonstrates higher governance bar on sustainability-linked pay and stakeholder accountability
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.