Wild Cosmetics·FMCG / Consumer Goods·London, UK·Founded 2015·Last verified 31 May 2026
40
out of 100
Below expectationsPending Review

Wild has built a genuine circular model around refillable deodorant, but sustainability claims rest on weak foundations: baseline emissions data only, no reduction targets, heavy reliance on offsets, and unverified renewable energy claims. The April 2025 Unilever acquisition undermines eco positioning—selling to a company with a documented greenwashing record and 18/100 ethical rating.

The calculation

Every score shows its working.

Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
FMCG / Consumer Goods sector ceiling.
30 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the 10 rubric questions, scored 0–10 each.
44 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 30) + (0.7 × 44) = 39.8
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on absolute emissions volume — physics-first.
× 1
Final score
Rounded. Below expectations.
40 / 100
The ten questions

Where Wild Cosmetics is strong, and where it isn't.

Strongest on Resource Use & Waste and Water Impact (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Targets & Commitments and Emissions Trajectory (2/10, 2/10).

Where the evidence comes from

Every document used, listed.

7 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.

Limited data coverage. This assessment is based on 7 sources, 57% of which are self-reported by the company. Scores may change as independent evidence becomes available.

[1]Self-reported
Carbon Emissions Report
2023
Q1Q2Q6Q8
View →
[2]Third-party verified
Wild brand rating on The Commons
Ongoing
Q1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q8Q9Q10
View →
[3]Self-reported
Come to the Deodorant Factory with Us
Unknown
Q4Q7
View →
[4]Self-reported
Wild's Environmental & Social Policy
Unknown
Q5Q8
View →
[5]Self-reported
Wild Impact Report 2024
2024
Q5Q6
View →
[6]Third-party verified
B Corp Directory – Wild Cosmetics
Ongoing
Q9
View →
[7]Public record
Wild Cosmetics: Wildly Misleading Ad – ASA Ruling
Unknown
Q10
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

Wild Cosmetics in context

Where Wild Cosmetics sits among fmcg / consumer goods peers.

Among the 41 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Wild Cosmetics is tied =21st of 41, with 1 other.

=21/41
Wild Cosmetics's rank
40
Industry average
23
Industry low
56
Industry high
How this score has moved

Wild Cosmetics's score over time.

today

Score history begins 5 April 2026.

As Wild Cosmetics's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.

We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.

What's being contested

This score is not currently being contested.

Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.

No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.

About Wild Cosmetics

Wild Cosmetics manufactures refillable aluminium deodorant cases with compostable refills, positioning itself as a plastic-free personal care brand. Founded in 2015, it has scaled rapidly into UK supermarkets (Tesco, Sainsbury's, Target) and international markets. The company is B Corp certified but was acquired by Unilever in April 2025.

Founded
2015
Headquarters
London, UK
Employees
~100-200
Annual revenue
~£65M
Company website ↗
Track Wild Cosmetics

We'll let you know when the score moves.

Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.

THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

HOW SINK STAYS INDEPENDENT

Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.