P&G achieves strong operational emissions reductions but masks a fundamentally unaligned business model. Scope 3 emissions rising 22.7% annually puts the company on a +3°C trajectory. Five active greenwashing lawsuits, NRDC SEC complaint, and documented boreal forest degradation reveal systematic misleading of investors on core sustainability claims.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Controversies & Red Flags (2/10, 3/10).
17 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
10 of 17 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 41 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, The Procter & Gamble Company sits 40th of 41.
Score history begins 8 February 2026.
As The Procter & Gamble Company's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Procter & Gamble is a Cincinnati-based multinational FMCG company manufacturing household, personal care, and health products including diapers, toilet paper, shampoo, and detergents. With $84.3bn revenue and 105,000 employees, P&G is among the world's largest consumer goods manufacturers, selling through supermarkets and retailers globally.
Peer FMCG giant with comparable greenwashing litigation and forest/palm sourcing controversies
View breakdown →Similar scale, supply-chain carbon opacity, and intensity-based target framework masking absolute growth
View breakdown →Direct competitor in oral care and household products; overlapping forest sourcing and greenwashing allegations
View breakdown →Household cleaning products peer with comparable waste/packaging linearity and limited biodiversity engagement
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.