Montblanc hides behind Richemont's group reporting, publishing no brand-level emissions, water, or nature data. Its SBTi targets use an intensity-based Scope 3 metric that permits absolute emissions to rise. No evidence of on-track delivery. Crocodile skin and leather use flagged by NGOs without mitigation strategy.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Energy Source (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (3/10, 3/10).
8 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 41 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Montblanc is tied =27th of 41, with 3 others.
Score history begins 9 April 2026.
As Montblanc's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Montblanc is a German luxury goods manufacturer founded in 1906, headquartered in Hamburg. Known for high-end writing instruments, leather goods, watches, and jewellery, it operates global manufacturing and retail networks. A subsidiary of Swiss luxury conglomerate Richemont, it sits in the mid-to-premium segment of FMCG/consumer goods.
Luxury conglomerate peer; larger scale, similarly complex multi-brand reporting structures and supply chains
View breakdown →Luxury group with stronger standalone brand-level ESG transparency and science-based targets than Montblanc
View breakdown →Richemont peer brand; similarly opaque brand-level sustainability data, group-level accountability only
View breakdown →Luxury manufacturer; privately-held, minimal public disclosure; comparable transparency weakness across luxury watch/goods sector
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.