Louis Vuitton, reported via parent LVMH, has cut operational emissions 55% but absolute total emissions rose 5% in 2024, driven by flat Scope 3 at 7.5 Mt. The company relied on intensity metrics while supply chain emissions grew, misled on 'reductions', and faces unresolved Amazon deforestation links through leather suppliers. Renewable energy at 71% but water stress and virgin plastic persist.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Water Impact (3/10, 4/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
8 of 12 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 41 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Louis Vuitton sits 23rd of 41.
Score history begins 9 April 2026.
As Louis Vuitton's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Louis Vuitton is a French luxury fashion and leather goods manufacturer, founded 1854 and headquartered in Paris. Part of LVMH conglomerate, it designs and sells high-end handbags, clothing, and accessories globally. The brand operates manufacturing, retail, and supply chain across multiple continents with significant resource and environmental footprint.
Peer luxury conglomerate; similarly documented intensity-vs-absolute emissions gap and supply-chain deforestation risk.
View breakdown →Large-scale fashion producer; comparable scale, supply chain complexity, and nature/water impact in high-stress regions.
View breakdown →Fashion retail group with similar circularity targets, plastic reduction commitments, and supplier engagement challenges.
View breakdown →Apparel/leather-dependent brand transitioning circular economy and renewable energy; contrasting decarbonisation trajectory.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.