Notion Labs sustainability score: 34/100

Notion has no publicly available Scope 1 or Scope 2 emissions data. As a ~1,200-employee SaaS company with office-based operations and third-party cloud hosting, estimated operational emissions are under 10,000 tonnes—small enough that non-disclosure is less critical, but still material for a mid-sized tech firm.

Zero Scope 3 reporting. Notion's supply chain includes significant cloud infrastructure (likely AWS data centres), employee commuting, business travel, and growing AI compute demand. With $400–500M revenue and 100M users, Scope 3 emissions from cloud infrastructure alone are material and unquantified.

No emissions reported in any year, so no trajectory exists. Company is rapidly growing—revenue up 60% (2023–2024), user base from 30M to 100M, with AI compute features launched. Growth trajectory strongly implies rising absolute emissions, unmonitored and unreported.

No RE100 membership, no power purchase agreements, no green energy tariffs, and no renewable energy strategy disclosed. As a SaaS company with moderate-growing energy consumption—especially with AI features—Notion has not engaged with or communicated energy sourcing.

Notion is a digital-only SaaS company with no manufacturing, extraction, or land use. Direct nature impact is minimal. No biodiversity policy, TNFD disclosure, or nature risk assessment found. Sector risk is low, but no formal acknowledgment or strategy exists.

No waste strategy, circular economy practices, or material procurement policy disclosed. As a SaaS firm, material footprint is low—primarily office waste and employee electronics. No supplier engagement on materials documented.

No water consumption data, policy, or impact assessment found. Direct office water use is minimal. However, third-party cloud data centres (likely AWS) powering Notion's service consume significant water for cooling—a growing concern with AI workloads—unaddressed by the company.

Notion has not publicly committed to any 2030 or 2050 climate goals through major frameworks (SBTi, net-zero pledges, etc.). No emissions reduction targets, offset strategy, or informal environmental claims found on corporate website or communications.

No sustainability report, no ESG data, no sustainability information on notion.com, no governance structure disclosed. Sustainability Directory rated Notion 0.6/10 and noted 'limited media coverage' and 'not yet a prominent player in sustainability discourse.' Significant gap for a $400–500M company.

No environmental controversies, greenwashing claims, regulatory actions, fines, or climate lawsuits found. No InfluenceMap climate lobbying profile. No trade association opposition to climate policy identified. No documented environmental harm.