Bioregional is a small sustainability consultancy with mission-lock via charity status and SBTi-approved absolute targets for travel and supplier engagement. The core weakness: no published operational emissions data, no multi-year verified trajectory, and no quantified supply chain inventory. Advocacy strength masks thin internal accountability.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Targets & Commitments (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (4/10, 4/10).
6 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
Limited data coverage. This assessment is based on 6 sources, 100% of which are self-reported by the company. Scores may change as independent evidence becomes available.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 8 major consulting / professional services brands we've scored, Bioregional Development sits 3rd of 8.
Score history begins 9 April 2026.
As Bioregional Development's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Bioregional is a UK-based sustainability consultancy and registered charity founded in 1994. With ~29 staff, it advises on net-zero policy, One Planet Living frameworks, and nature-positive development. A knowledge-intensive business with minimal direct environmental footprint but significant influence on client-side outcomes.
Sustainability-first mission structure and transparency; peer-scale accountability without scale advantages.
View breakdown →Mission-locked via charter; high governance transparency but also limited scale in broader financial sector.
View breakdown →Small-scale certified B Corp with published sustainability targets; similar disclosure gaps on quantified emissions.
View breakdown →Published SBTi targets and material supply chain engagement; comparable size and transparency aspirations versus verification gaps.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.