Linde reports 37.4Mt CO₂e annually with declining absolute emissions and an SBTi-validated 2035 target, but lacks Scope 3 reduction targets and admits supply chain mapping is early-stage. Trade association memberships misaligned with climate goals, negative direct lobbying on EU renewable policy, and a $171M historical penalty pattern undermine credibility. Biodiversity risk is dismissed without verification.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Transparency & Accountability (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Controversies & Red Flags (3/10, 5/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
6 of 12 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 8 major chemicals brands we've scored, Linde sits 3rd of 8.
Score history begins 11 April 2026.
As Linde's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Linde is a multinational industrial gas and chemical company headquartered in Guildford, UK, with 66,323 employees and $33B revenue (FY2024). It produces gases, process systems, and chemicals for industrial, medical, and specialty sectors. A top-three global player in its category, Linde operates 100+ production sites globally with natural gas as primary feedstock for hydrogen production.
Direct industrial gas peer with similar carbon footprint scale and supply chain decarbonisation challenges.
View breakdown →Large chemical manufacturer facing comparable Scope 3 mapping delays and trade association policy conflicts.
View breakdown →Oil & gas incumbent with historical penalties, negative climate lobbying, and SBTi near-term targets minus net-zero.
View breakdown →Industrial feedstock producer with similar energy-intensive operations and intensity-based water/waste targets.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.