Yara is a fertilizer giant whose core business model—synthesizing nitrogen from fossil gas—remains fundamentally misaligned with climate science. Scope 3 emissions dominate (73% of total footprint) yet targets exclude upstream suppliers. A tiny green hydrogen pilot and delayed SBTi validation cannot mask stalled decarbonization and regulatory fines for water pollution.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Transparency & Accountability (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Targets & Commitments (3/10, 3/10).
15 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
11 of 15 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 8 major chemicals brands we've scored, Yara International ASA sits 7th of 8.
Score history begins 11 April 2026.
As Yara International ASA's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Yara International is a Norwegian chemical company and the world's largest producer of nitrogen fertilizers and ammonia. Founded 2003, headquartered in Oslo, it employs over 16,000 people and generated €12.6 billion in revenue (2024). The company operates production facilities globally and is majority-owned by the Norwegian government.
Direct global competitor in synthetic fertilizers with similar scope 3 emissions and supply chain carbon challenge.
View breakdown →Fossil fuel energy company defending gas-dependent supply chains and lobbying amid regulatory pressure.
View breakdown →Large conglomerate with unvalidated SBTi targets, upstream scope 3 exclusions, and ongoing water-pollution controversies.
View breakdown →Multinational with net-zero pledges, material scope 3 gaps, and scrutiny over circular-economy greenwashing.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.