PUMA reports comprehensive climate data with third-party verification and achieved a 29% absolute emissions reduction from 2017. However, its renewable energy claim relies entirely on unbundled RECs rather than additionality-based procurement, understating decarbonization integrity. Ongoing controversies over Palestinian settlement sponsorship and worker rights concerns materially undermine sustainability credibility.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (3/10, 5/10).
16 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 35 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Puma is tied =21st of 35, with 1 other.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As Puma's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
PUMA is a German sportswear and athletic footwear manufacturer founded in 1948, headquartered in Herzogenaurach. With ~18,700 employees and €8.8bn revenue (2024), it designs and sells apparel, footwear, and accessories across lifestyle and performance segments, competing directly with Nike and Adidas in the global athletic wear market.
Direct apparel-sector competitor with similar scale and supply chain complexity; baseline for PUMA performance
View breakdown →Peer athletic footwear and sportswear manufacturer; comparable transparency and climate commitment architecture
View breakdown →Mission-driven apparel brand with stronger governance structures; contrasts PUMA's sustainability architecture
View breakdown →Large-scale apparel group with documented supply chain and labour governance challenges; similar controversy profile
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.