Nike has strong operational emissions controls and renewable energy deployment, but Scope 3 emissions—96% of its footprint—remain above 2015 baseline. Nature impact is poorly assessed, circularity metrics lack transparency, and the company's trade association memberships actively oppose climate policy, undercutting its direct commitments.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (3/10, 3/10).
21 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
15 of 21 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 35 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Nike sits 24th of 35.
Score history begins 8 February 2026.
As Nike's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Nike designs, markets, and sells footwear, apparel, and sporting equipment globally. Headquartered in Beaverton, Oregon, it operates a vertically integrated supply chain across Vietnam, China, Indonesia, and India. With $46.7B revenue (FY2022) and 76,700 employees, Nike is a sector leader by scale but faces intense scrutiny on labor practices and environmental footprint.
Peer apparel manufacturer with similar supply chain footprint and greenwashing exposure across nature and circularity claims.
View breakdown →Fast-fashion competitor with lower disclosure transparency but comparable Scope 3 dominance and water intensity concerns.
View breakdown →Apparel brand with stronger nature commitments and verified deforestation-free supply chain, contrasting Nike's assessment gaps.
View breakdown →Sector peer with trade association exposure criticisms and acknowledged supply chain emissions trajectory challenges.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.