Under Armour has retracted its science-based climate targets, increased absolute emissions, and disclosed almost no supply chain decarbonization strategy. The company reports Scope 3 emissions but provides zero category breakdowns. Biodiversity, water stewardship, and circular design remain largely unaddressed despite significant exposure in cotton and synthetic supply chains.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Controversies & Red Flags (5/10, 5/10). Weakest on Targets & Commitments and Water Impact (1/10, 1/10).
15 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
12 of 15 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 35 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Under Armour sits 35th of 35.
Score history begins 6 April 2026.
As Under Armour's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Under Armour is a US-based apparel manufacturer founded in 1996, headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland. The company designs and sells athletic footwear, apparel, and accessories globally, competing in performance and outdoor segments. It operates a complex global supply chain for synthetic fabrics, cotton, and leather materials.
Similar scale apparel peer; higher transparency but also off-track on emissions targets.
View breakdown →Direct competitor; faces comparable supply chain water and biodiversity gaps; stronger renewable energy commitment.
View breakdown →Mid-market apparel rival; currently ahead on circular design and water accountability; lower absolute footprint.
View breakdown →Outdoor apparel peer under same parent; stronger forest protection policies but comparable emissions growth.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.