Jimmy Choo discloses emissions only at parent-company level with no brand-specific quantification. Scope 3 emissions are rising, deforestation risk in leather supply chains remains unaddressed despite policy commitments, and science-based targets lack net-zero validation. Forest 500 and Good On You both rate the company poorly on environmental ambition.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Energy Source (5/10, 4/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Emissions Trajectory (2/10, 2/10).
6 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
Limited data coverage. This assessment is based on 6 sources, 33% of which are self-reported by the company. Scores may change as independent evidence becomes available.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 35 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Jimmy Choo sits 32nd of 35.
Score history begins 9 April 2026.
As Jimmy Choo's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Jimmy Choo is a London-based luxury footwear and accessories brand founded in 1996, owned by Capri Holdings. Known for handcrafted women's shoes and leather goods, it operates approximately 234 stores globally and positions itself in the premium segment of the apparel and accessories market.
Luxury conglomerate peer with similar leather-dependent supply chains and deforestation risk exposure.
View breakdown →Comparable luxury fashion holding with greater sustainability disclosure and stronger science-based target commitments.
View breakdown →Apparel brand with publicly quantified Scope 3 emissions and verified circularity roadmap, contrasting with Jimmy Choo's lack of brand-level data.
View breakdown →Direct competitor in accessible luxury footwear with transparent water and waste quantification and third-party verification.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.