Zurich has operational climate discipline but its financed emissions strategy is deliberately weak. It abandoned SBTi validation, set intensity-only targets below IPCC science, exited the Net Zero Insurance Alliance, and remains the world's 6th largest fossil fuel insurer. Operational transparency masks portfolio misalignment.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Energy Source and Transparency & Accountability (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Targets & Commitments and Water Impact (4/10, 4/10).
16 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
12 of 16 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 6 major insurance brands we've scored, Zurich Insurance sits 4th of 6.
Score history begins 11 April 2026.
As Zurich Insurance's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Zurich Insurance is a global property and casualty insurer headquartered in Switzerland, founded in 1872. With ~53,000 employees and $59bn in FY2020 revenue, it underwrites commercial, personal, and specialty insurance across 210 countries. Its sustainability impact is dominated by its $520M annual fossil fuel insurance portfolio.
Direct peer: also major global insurer with fossil fuel exposure and climate transition targets under scrutiny.
View breakdown →Comparable insurer with similar financed emissions disclosure and sectoral coal/fossil fuel exit debates.
View breakdown →Large European insurer with distinct net-zero commitment pattern and science-based target validation choices.
View breakdown →Global insurance peer with parallel climate governance structure and controversial fossil fuel portfolio decisions.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.