Crédit Agricole is a top fossil fuel financier ($55.8B over four years) with rising financed emissions and declining supply chain disclosure granularity. Operational emissions are falling, but massive Scope 3 growth and a €7.6M ECB fine for climate risk failures expose material governance gaps. Its net-zero 2050 targets lack SBTi validation.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Controversies & Red Flags (2/10, 3/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 29 major financial services / banking brands we've scored, Crédit Agricole is tied =26th of 29, with 2 others.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As Crédit Agricole's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Crédit Agricole is a French banking group founded in 1894, headquartered in Montrouge. With 150,000 employees and €25.2B in FY2023 revenue, it is one of Europe's largest retail and commercial banks. The group operates across consumer banking, asset management, insurance, and corporate investment banking.
French peer bank with similar scale, fossil fuel exposure, and regulatory compliance challenges in climate risk governance.
View breakdown →Global systemically important bank with comparable financed emissions magnitude and mixed net-zero target validation status.
View breakdown →European lender facing similar ECB climate risk scrutiny and top-ranking fossil fuel financing controversy.
View breakdown →UK bank undergoing climate governance reform following regulatory sanctions, comparable transition narrative trajectory.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.