Legal & General scores 34/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment — scored from public data only, no company payment can change a number. Last verified May 2026.
That places Legal & General joint 489th of 809 companies scored, and joint 26th of 46 in Financial Services / Banking.
Legal & General discloses carbon targets and renewable energy progress but relies on intensity metrics for its largest climate impact—financed emissions. Operational emissions have genuinely fallen 30% since 2021, yet the investment portfolio (where real-world decarbonisation matters) is tracked only per pound invested, not absolute tonnes. Nature and water data remain absent, and a 2025 investigation found fossil fuels in a fund labelled 'Climate Pathway.'
Every supplier scored from public evidence like this, ranked, in 48 hours. No questionnaires, and your suppliers never know.
This score uses public evidence only. Challenge any question for free, or ask for a human review of evidence you haven't published.
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Transparency & Accountability and Carbon Footprint — Operations (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Resource Use & Waste (3/10, 3/10).
10 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Where Legal & General sits among financial services / banking peers.
Among the 46 major financial services / banking brands we've scored, Legal & General is tied =26th of 46, with 3 others.
Legal & General's score has moved from 46 to 34 across 2 recorded reviews — down 12 points.
v2.5.7 financed-emissions rule applied retroactively (record last scored before the rule): scale 0.95 -> 0.7, score 46 -> 34. No question marks changed.
Initial score at platform launch
This score is not currently being contested.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Legal & General is a UK-headquartered financial services and asset management company founded in 1836, employing over 9,300 people. It operates insurance, pension administration, and institutional investment management divisions, managing c.£1.4 trillion in assets. As a major institutional investor, its climate footprint is dominated by financed emissions rather than direct operations.
Institutional investor with intensity-based portfolio decarbonisation targets, similar financed-emissions measurement limitations.
View breakdown →UK bank with SBTi-validated operational targets and investment portfolio climate commitments, comparable governance structure.
View breakdown →Multinational financial services firm facing greenwashing scrutiny over green fund composition and financed emissions intensity metrics.
View breakdown →UK-based insurance and asset management peer with similar investment portfolio scale and TNFD-aligned nature disclosure approach.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Checking your suppliers?
Get your list scored in 48 hours →Been scored?
See what's behind your number →Nobody can pay us to change a number.