Carbon Footprint — Operations: How does PrettyLittleThing score?

PrettyLittleThing does not publish standalone emissions data. Parent company Boohoo Group reported total market-based emissions of 781,146 tCO2e for FY2023, down from 852,370 tCO2e in FY2022, but does not break out PLT-specific operational emissions. PLT itself provides no concrete data on its carbon footprint. Given PLT is a major subsidiary of a group with ~780K tonnes total emissions, PLT's share of operational emissions is likely material but unquantified at the brand level. Score reflects p

Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain: How does PrettyLittleThing score?

PLT has a complex global supply chain spanning textile manufacturing across multiple countries but provides no brand-specific Scope 3 data. Boohoo Group reported Scope 3 figures at the group level (approximately 1,022,034 tCO2e in 2021) but Stand.earth noted Boohoo reported a significant emission increase in both purchased goods and upstream transportation categories from 2019 to 2021. An estimated 80-90% of PLT's clothing is made from virgin synthetic fabrics derived from fossil fuels, indicati

Emissions Trajectory: How does PrettyLittleThing score?

Boohoo Group's total emissions decreased 8% from 852,370 to 781,146 tCO2e between FY2022 and FY2023, but Stand.earth confirmed this Scope 3 Category 1 decrease was attributed to a 22% decrease in the quantity of goods sold, not genuine decarbonisation efforts. Emissions had also risen significantly from 2019 to 2021. The Scope 3 target is intensity-based (per unit of value added), not absolute, which is a greenwashing red flag. No evidence of meaningful trajectory improvement from actual decarbo

Energy Source: How does PrettyLittleThing score?

Boohoo Group claims a 100% renewable electricity target for its own operations, but Stand.earth notes this is through low-impact means (likely unbundled RECs). The company scored F on renewable and energy efficient manufacturing from Stand.earth, with no evidence of training, support, or transition plans for suppliers. PLT itself does not publish any energy data. There is no supply chain renewable energy advocacy or targets.

Nature & Biodiversity Impact: How does PrettyLittleThing score?

PLT has no biodiversity policy, no TNFD disclosure, and no deforestation-free commitment with verification. An estimated 80-90% of its products use virgin synthetic fabrics derived from fossil fuels. Only 1.65% of total cotton purchased was organic, and only 13% was Better Cotton certified. PLT uses leather, wool, and down without disclosing sources or having an animal welfare policy. The fast fashion model drives significant textile waste and microplastic pollution with no mitigation strategy.

Resource Use & Waste: How does PrettyLittleThing score?

PLT operates a linear take-make-waste model. Good On You confirms there is no evidence PLT implements any waste reduction initiatives. The brand adds up to 100-150 new items daily, and has sold dresses for as little as 8p. While a resale marketplace app exists, critics widely regard this as greenwashing rather than genuine circularity, as the core business model of ultra-high-volume, low-quality, disposable clothing remains unchanged. Boohoo pledged no textile waste to UK landfill by 2025, but e

Water Impact: How does PrettyLittleThing score?

PLT provides no concrete data on its water usage, water footprint, or chemical management. Good On You states there is no evidence PLT has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals or implement water reduction initiatives. As a fast fashion brand relying heavily on synthetic and cotton textiles, the supply chain water impact — from dyeing, finishing, cotton irrigation, and microfibre shedding — is inherently significant with zero disclosed management or mitigation.

Targets & Commitments: How does PrettyLittleThing score?

Boohoo Group claims SBTi-aligned targets but has submitted a near-term target that appears to still be under reassessment — not validated. The Scope 3 target is intensity-based (52% reduction per unit of value added by 2030), not absolute, which is a critical weakness. Stand.earth notes the company does not have a net-zero transition plan or evidence of a thermal energy transition strategy. PLT itself has not made any independent public commitments to science-based emissions reduction targets or

Transparency & Accountability: How does PrettyLittleThing score?

PLT publishes virtually no sustainability data at the brand level. Its sustainability webpage offers only vague aspirational language with no quantitative data. All reporting is at the Boohoo Group level, which itself has been criticised for incomplete and inadequate disclosure. Good On You rated PLT 'Not Good Enough' due to lack of positive action and transparency. The Good Shopping Guide (February 2025) confirmed PLT continues to score poorly across ethical measurements. No dedicated sustainab

Controversies & Red Flags: How does PrettyLittleThing score?

Starting at 8, significant deductions apply: UK CMA greenwashing investigation resulted in Boohoo signing a formal agreement in March 2024 to use only accurate green claims (-2). Stand.earth criticism of rising emissions and lagging climate action (-1). Widespread credible greenwashing accusations from multiple NGOs, journalists, and campaigners including Business of Fashion, Green Matters, Ethical Consumer, Huck Magazine (-2). Modern slavery allegations and labour rights scandals in Boohoo supp

← Back to leaderboard

PrettyLittleThing Sustainability Score: 12/100

◌ Pending Review

👗 Apparel (Fast Fashion)GBCritical concern

~1,000 employees~$544M (2022) revenueRanked #498 of 503Website ↗

PrettyLittleThing is a apparel (fast fashion) company headquartered in GB. Based on our 10-question rubric, PrettyLittleThing scores 12/100 — rated as a critical concern for sustainability.

SINK Score Breakdown

How we calculated PrettyLittleThing's score using our formula: (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale Penalty

Base Impact

Apparel (Fast Fashion) industry ceiling

Performance

11/100

10 questions scored below

Scale Penalty

0.95x

emissions volume multiplier

SINK Score

(0.3 × 15 + 0.7 × 11) × 0.95 = 12

10-Question Rubric Breakdown

Click any question to see the reasoning, sources and community challenges.

2/10

Carbon Footprint — Operations

1/10

Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain

1/10

Emissions Trajectory

2/10

Energy Source

0/10

Nature & Biodiversity Impact

1/10

Resource Use & Waste

0/10

Water Impact

1/10

Targets & Commitments

1/10

Transparency & Accountability

Q10

2/10

Controversies & Red Flags

Community Verification

0 verifications · 0 challenges · Scored using SINK editorial review

Last scored: 4 Apr 2026

Think this score is wrong?

Challenge any question above with evidence. All challenges are published publicly.

Read methodology →

More in Apparel (Fast Fashion)

40H&M 35Primark 34New Look 34Gap 32River Island 32Inditex (Zara)