Maersk has strong climate targets validated by SBTi and comprehensive emissions reporting across all scopes, but absolute emissions rose 7.57% in 2024 despite intensity improvements. Nature impact remains largely unquantified; water and waste disclosure is thin. Green methanol scaling claims face greenwashing questions.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Targets & Commitments (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Emissions Trajectory (3/10, 3/10).
19 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
12 of 19 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 14 major shipping / logistics brands we've scored, A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S sits 8th of 14.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S is a Danish shipping and logistics conglomerate operating 700+ vessels globally, with terminals, container shipping, and supply chain services. Revenue exceeds $81 billion. As one of the world's largest container carriers, its climate and ocean impacts are sector-defining but only partially decarbonized.
Global shipping competitor with similar decarbonisation pressures and fuel transition pathway challenges
View breakdown →Large multinational cited alongside Maersk by NewClimate as committing to deep value chain decarbonisation targets
View breakdown →Major logistics player with comparable Scope 3 emissions footprint and supply chain engagement complexity
View breakdown →Logistics competitor with similar absolute emissions growth despite intensity improvements and renewable energy investments
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.