TAG Heuer publishes no standalone emissions data despite mid-sized operations. Parent company LVMH's group-level targets mask the brand's complete lack of quantified environmental disclosure. Supply chain risks—exotic leather, mined metals, documented deforestation links—remain unresolved at brand level.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Energy Source (6/10, 5/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Water Impact (2/10, 3/10).
7 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
Limited data coverage. This assessment is based on 7 sources, 43% of which are self-reported by the company. Scores may change as independent evidence becomes available.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 21 major electronics / hardware brands we've scored, TAG Heuer is tied =10th of 21, with 1 other.
Score history begins 9 April 2026.
As TAG Heuer's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
TAG Heuer is a Swiss luxury watchmaker founded in 1860, headquartered in La Chaux-de-Fonds. Known for precision sports watches and chronographs, it operates ~100 boutiques globally with approximately 6,000 employees. Owned by LVMH since 1985, it competes in the high-end horology segment alongside Rolex and Omega.
Direct competitor in luxury watches; comparable scale and supply chain complexity with likely superior environmental data
View breakdown →Parent company; LVMH group-level sustainability targets and programmes structure TAG Heuer's environmental governance
View breakdown →Luxury conglomerate peer with comparable supply chain risks in leather, metals, and diamonds; similar intensity-based targets critique
View breakdown →Luxury jewellery and watch brand peer within Richemont; shared sourcing footprint in precious metals and diamonds
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.