TUI discloses emissions across most scopes but omits material Scope 3 categories, particularly customer travel. Airline targets are intensity-based, masking absolute emission growth risks. A Hamburg court found a TUI Cruises net-zero advertising claim misleading, and the Dutch Advertising Board separately upheld a complaint over TUI's 'Fair Friday' campaign. Trade association misalignment on climate policy compounds weak governance.
This score is built from public data only. If your practice is stronger than your disclosure, submit evidence for review — or challenge any question, free.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Transparency & Accountability (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (3/10, 3/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
“We regard specific carbon emissions (in g CO2/rpk) from our aircraft fleet as the most relevant non-financial key performance indicator”
“In 2025, TUI reported Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 145,539 tCO₂e using the market-based method”
“TUI cooperates with suppliers in order to capture relevant information about their sustainability performance”
“achieving reductions versus our FY19 baseline of -7.8% (-0.9%pts improvement vs. FY25 target) in Airline”
“526 contrail avoidance flights were done in 2025”
“1,700 tons of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) were used by TUI airline in the financial year 2024”
“TUI's 2030 science-based targets for airline, cruises and hotels achieved validation from the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) in January 2023”
“We are committed to avoiding and reducing emissions rather than offsetting them”
“The targets are continually monitored by the management of the business areas, the Group Sustainability Team and the Sustainability Council”
“The Regional Court of Hamburg declared a TUI Cruises climate-related advertising statement to be misleading”
“TUI is a member of Airlines for Europe and TUIfly, a wholly owned subsidiary, is a member of the International Air Transport Association, both are actively and negatively engaged on EU climate policy”
“approximately 4 million water bottles were reduced between 2022 and 2024, which is equivalent to a reduction of 35%”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 31 major aerospace brands we've scored, TUI is tied =8th of 31, with 1 other.
Score history begins 6 April 2026.
As TUI's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
TUI is a global tourism and travel group headquartered in Hanover, Germany, operating airlines, cruise ships, hotels, and tour packages across 180 destinations. The company serves approximately 27 million customers annually and is one of Europe's largest integrated travel operators, though heavily reliant on aviation and cruise—carbon-intensive sectors.
European low-cost airline with legacy emissions intensity focus; comparable scale and disclosure gaps.
View breakdown →European carrier with similar intensity-based climate targets and aviation sector carbon exposure.
View breakdown →Global cruise operator; parallel absolute decarbonization targets and nature/water risk in coastal tourism.
View breakdown →Large hotel chain operator; comparable property portfolio, water stress, and supply chain measurement gaps.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.