CanO Water·Food & Beverage (non-meat)·London, UK·Founded 2019·Last verified 31 May 2026
36
out of 100
Below expectationsPending Review

CanO Water has built its pitch on aluminium's recyclability versus plastic, but lacks any quantified environmental data to back claims. No emissions targets, no supply chain transparency, no water impact assessment despite water being its core product. The company operates as a 24-person distributor with outsourced production and founder-driven sustainability messaging that simplifies material trade-offs.

The calculation

Every score shows its working.

Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
Food & Beverage (non-meat) sector ceiling.
50 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the 10 rubric questions, scored 0–10 each.
30 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 50) + (0.7 × 30) = 36.0
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on absolute emissions volume — physics-first.
× 1
Final score
Rounded. Below expectations.
36 / 100
The ten questions

Where CanO Water is strong, and where it isn't.

Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Resource Use & Waste (7/10, 5/10). Weakest on Transparency & Accountability and Targets & Commitments (2/10, 2/10).

Where the evidence comes from

Every document used, listed.

7 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.

Limited data coverage. This assessment is based on 7 sources, 43% of which are self-reported by the company. Scores may change as independent evidence becomes available.

[1]Public record
CanO Water cuts carbon footprint with move to UK production
2024
Q1Q2Q3Q8
View →
[2]Self-reported
CanO Water company profile
Ongoing
Q1
View →
[3]Self-reported
CanO Water sustainability page
Ongoing
Q2Q5Q9
View →
[4]Self-reported
CanO Water homepage
Ongoing
Q4
View →
[5]Public record
CanO Water canned environment — Yahoo Finance feature
2024
Q3Q7
View →
[6]Public record
CanO Water calls out industry greenwashing with World Earth Day stunt
2024
Q9Q10
View →
[7]Third-party verified
Canned water: the not-so-sustainable solution
Unknown
Q10
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

CanO Water in context

Where CanO Water sits among food & beverage (non-meat) peers.

Among the 41 major food & beverage (non-meat) brands we've scored, CanO Water is tied =34th of 41, with 2 others.

=34/41
CanO Water's rank
43
Industry average
31
Industry low
57
Industry high
How this score has moved

CanO Water's score over time.

today

Score history begins 5 April 2026.

As CanO Water's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.

We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.

What's being contested

This score is not currently being contested.

Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.

No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.

About CanO Water

CanO Water is a UK-based bottled water company founded in 2019 that packages spring water in aluminium cans as an alternative to plastic. The company sources water from a Yorkshire spring as of 2024 and outsources canning to UK partners. It positions itself as a sustainability-focused brand within the non-alcoholic beverage sector, competing on packaging material choice rather than scale.

Founded
2019
Headquarters
London, UK
Employees
~24
Annual revenue
~£5M
Company website ↗
Track CanO Water

We'll let you know when the score moves.

Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.

THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

HOW SINK STAYS INDEPENDENT

Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.