Monster's emissions are rising 17% year-on-year while absolute reduction targets remain unvalidated. The company discloses Scope 1 and 2 data but lacks third-party verification, independently confirmed SBTi targets, and any Scope 3 reduction commitments despite Scope 3 representing 99% of total emissions. Weak biodiversity disclosure and a D-grade plastic pollution rating compound the picture.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Controversies & Red Flags (5/10, 5/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Emissions Trajectory (2/10, 2/10).
9 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 41 major food & beverage (non-meat) brands we've scored, Monster Beverage is tied =39th of 41, with 1 other.
Score history begins 11 April 2026.
As Monster Beverage's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Monster Beverage Corporation manufactures and distributes energy drinks globally. Founded in 1935 and headquartered in Minnesota, the company operates an asset-light model, outsourcing manufacturing to third-party bottlers and co-packers. It competes in the non-alcoholic beverage sector alongside Red Bull, energy drink manufacturers, and soft drink giants.
Major beverage peer with stronger emissions targets but similar supply chain scale challenges
View breakdown →Comparable F&B scale and asset-light model; useful contrast on biodiversity and Scope 3 accountability
View breakdown →Direct energy drink competitor; reference point for benchmark disclosure and sustainability ambition
View breakdown →Smaller beverage producer with higher transparency and stronger environmental commitments; contrasting approach
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.