Fever-Tree has credible SBTi-validated net-zero targets and switched away from offsets to insetting, but operational emissions rose 12% year-on-year to 2023. Supply chain Scope 3 reporting is incomplete, water strategy remains unquantified, and nature work is philanthropic rather than verified net-positive. The company's tiny absolute footprint limits material climate impact regardless of trajectory direction.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Energy Source (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Water Impact (3/10, 4/10).
7 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
Limited data coverage. This assessment is based on 7 sources, 86% of which are self-reported by the company. Scores may change as independent evidence becomes available.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 41 major food & beverage (non-meat) brands we've scored, Fever-Tree Drinks is tied =5th of 41, with 1 other.
Score history begins 11 April 2026.
As Fever-Tree Drinks's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Fever-Tree is a premium mixer and soft drinks manufacturer founded in 2005 and headquartered in London. It produces botanical spirits mixers, energy drinks, and soft drinks using glass bottles and aluminium cans. The company operates globally with £368M revenue and positions itself in the premium non-alcoholic beverage sector.
UK-headquartered beverage maker with similar premium positioning and nature conservation focus via Earthwatch partnership.
View breakdown →Plant-based beverage brand with aggressive net-zero targets and strong circular packaging ambitions; comparable sustainability ambition.
View breakdown →Global food and beverage corporation with SBTi targets and circular economy focus; vastly larger scale, shared supply chain complexity.
View breakdown →Premium beverage brand with origin-based sourcing in ecologically sensitive regions; similar biodiversity risk profile and supply chain transparency challenges.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.