Tiffany & Co.·Retail (non-fashion)·New York City, United States·Founded 1837·Last verified 31 May 2026
55
out of 100
Making progressPending Review

Tiffany has credible absolute emission reductions and SBTi-validated net-zero targets, but supply chain opacity remains severe. Mining-linked Scope 3 emissions dominate its footprint with only 13% of suppliers committed to climate targets. Water data is entirely absent, biodiversity risk is unquantified, and third-party verification gaps persist despite consistent annual reporting.

The calculation

Every score shows its working.

Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
Retail (non-fashion) sector ceiling.
48 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the 10 rubric questions, scored 0–10 each.
58 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 48) + (0.7 × 58) = 55.0
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on absolute emissions volume — physics-first.
× 1
Final score
Rounded. Making progress.
55 / 100
The ten questions

Where Tiffany & Co. is strong, and where it isn't.

Strongest on Targets & Commitments and Energy Source (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Resource Use & Waste (3/10, 5/10).

Where the evidence comes from

Every document used, listed.

10 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.

[1]Third-party verified
DitchCarbon: Tiffany & Co. Emissions Profile
Ongoing
Q1Q2
View →
[2]Self-reported
Tiffany & Co. 2024 Sustainability Report
2025
Q1Q2Q3Q6Q9
View →
[3]Self-reported
Tiffany & Co. SBTi Net-Zero Target Approval
2023
Q3Q4Q8
View →
[4]Third-party verified
Smart Energy Decisions: Tiffany SBTi Approval
2023
Q4
View →
[5]Self-reported
Tiffany & Co. Mobilizes $6.5M for The Nature Conservancy
Unknown
Q5
View →
[6]Self-reported
Tiffany & Co. Sustainability: The Planet
Ongoing
Q5
View →
[7]Third-party verified
Good On You: Tiffany & Co. Brand Directory
2026
Q6Q10
View →
[8]Self-reported
Tiffany & Co. Sustainability Homepage
Ongoing
Q7Q9
View →
[9]Public record
TIME: Tiffany's Sustainable Mining Stance
Unknown
Q10
View →
[10]Self-reported
Tiffany & Co. Net-Zero Target Page
Ongoing
Q8
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

Tiffany & Co. in context

Tiffany & Co. is the highest-scoring retail (non-fashion) company we've rated.

Among the 43 major retail (non-fashion) brands we've scored, Tiffany & Co. sits 1st of 43.

1/43
Tiffany & Co.'s rank
39
Industry average
18
Industry low
55
Industry high
How this score has moved

Tiffany & Co.'s score over time.

today

Score history begins 9 April 2026.

As Tiffany & Co.'s score updates, the trajectory will appear here.

We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.

What's being contested

This score is not currently being contested.

Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.

No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.

About Tiffany & Co.

Tiffany & Co. is a US-based luxury jewelry retailer founded in 1837, headquartered in New York City. The company designs, manufactures, and retails fine jewelry, diamonds, and watches globally. It operates manufacturing facilities for diamond polishing and jewelry production alongside a network of retail stores and e-commerce channels.

Founded
1837
Headquarters
New York City, United States
Employees
~14,000
Annual revenue
~$4.2B
Company website ↗
Track Tiffany & Co.

We'll let you know when the score moves.

Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.

THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

HOW SINK STAYS INDEPENDENT

Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.