Too Good To Go's core mission—reducing food waste—delivers genuine environmental impact, offsetting weak operational climate reporting. The company stopped disclosing emissions data after 2020 when its verification partner Planetly shut down. Growth from 350 to 1,900 employees since 2019 almost certainly increased absolute emissions, yet no post-2020 figures exist. B Corp certification and clean regulatory record are genuine strengths; climate strategy is not.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Transparency & Accountability (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Targets & Commitments (2/10, 3/10).
11 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 35 major saas / digital services brands we've scored, Too Good To Go is tied =8th of 35, with 3 others.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As Too Good To Go's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Too Good To Go is a Copenhagen-based SaaS marketplace connecting consumers with surplus food from restaurants, bakeries, and grocery stores at discounted prices. Founded in 2016, the company operates in 19 countries and has saved over 135 million meals from waste. Its core business model directly addresses food waste reduction—a major lever for environmental impact.
Food waste & community sharing platform; similar mission model, comparable scale and reporting transparency gaps.
View breakdown →Surplus produce rescue business; circular economy model, but smaller scale and different supply-side focus.
View breakdown →Food supply chain transparency leader; stronger internal sustainability reporting but narrower food waste scope.
View breakdown →B Corp SaaS giant with comprehensive emissions reporting; comparable size, far superior climate disclosure and SBTi alignment.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.