Virgin Atlantic reports operational emissions transparently but lacks third-party verification and supply chain granularity. Absolute emissions are rising as the airline expands capacity despite intensity improvements. The company faced ASA ad bans for SAF greenwashing, continued making banned claims on social media, and opposes demand-management climate policy. Nature impacts are entirely unreported.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Targets & Commitments (5/10, 5/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Water Impact (1/10, 2/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
9 of 12 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 18 major aerospace brands we've scored, Virgin Atlantic is tied =4th of 18, with 1 other.
Score history begins 6 April 2026.
As Virgin Atlantic's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Virgin Atlantic is a UK-based airline founded in 1976, operating long-haul and European routes from Crawley, West Sussex. The carrier operates approximately 70 aircraft serving destinations across Europe, North America, Africa, and Asia. As a mid-sized international airline, it competes with legacy carriers and budget operators while facing pressure to decarbonize aviation.
Budget airline with similar emissions growth trajectory and climate policy opposition record.
View breakdown →European short-haul carrier facing comparable SAF scaling challenges and greenwashing scrutiny.
View breakdown →Major international airline with higher SAF commitments but also intensity-based interim targets.
View breakdown →UK-based energy company with similarly weak nature/biodiversity disclosure and consumer trust issues.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.