Aston Martin Lagonda Global·Automotive·Gaydon, United Kingdom·Founded 1913·Last verified 31 May 2026
41
out of 100
Below expectationsPending Review

Aston Martin claims carbon-neutral manufacturing via offsets rather than emissions cuts, masking weak absolute reductions. Scope 3 (99% of emissions) lacks verified year-on-year reduction data. Electrification timelines have slipped. Site-level renewable energy and biodiversity work cannot offset the structural problem: product-use emissions remain unmitigated.

The calculation

Every score shows its working.

Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
Automotive sector ceiling.
35 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the 10 rubric questions, scored 0–10 each.
46 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 35) + (0.7 × 46) = 42.7
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on absolute emissions volume — physics-first.
× 0.95
Final score
Rounded. Below expectations.
41 / 100
The ten questions

Where Aston Martin Lagonda Global is strong, and where it isn't.

Strongest on Energy Source and Carbon Footprint — Operations (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Targets & Commitments (2/10, 3/10).

Where the evidence comes from

Every document used, listed.

9 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.

[1]Self-reported
Aston Martin Sustainability Report 2024
2025
Q1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9Q10
View →
[2]Self-reported
Aston Martin Sustainability Performance Data Report 2024
2025
Q1Q2Q3
View →
[3]Self-reported
Aston Martin Racing. Green. Strategy Announcement
2022
Q5Q6
View →
[4]Self-reported
Aston Martin Carbon Neutral Manufacturing Update
2023
Q4Q8
View →
[5]Third-party verified
DitchCarbon Aston Martin Emissions Profile
Ongoing
Q2Q3
View →
[6]Third-party verified
Science Based Targets initiative Target Dashboard
Ongoing
Q8
View →
[7]Public record
ASA Rejects Greenwashing Complaint Against Aramco F1 Ads
Unknown
Q10
View →
[8]Third-party verified
InfluenceMap: Automakers and Climate Policy Advocacy – Global Analysis
Unknown
Q10
View →
[9]Public record
How is Aston Martin becoming a leader in ESG strategies?
Unknown
Q5
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

Aston Martin Lagonda Global in context

Where Aston Martin Lagonda Global sits among automotive peers.

Among the 24 major automotive brands we've scored, Aston Martin Lagonda Global sits 2nd of 24.

2/24
Aston Martin Lagonda Global's rank
30
Industry average
22
Industry low
45
Industry high
How this score has moved

Aston Martin Lagonda Global's score over time.

today

Score history begins 11 April 2026.

As Aston Martin Lagonda Global's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.

We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.

What's being contested

This score is not currently being contested.

Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.

No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.

About Aston Martin Lagonda Global

Aston Martin Lagonda Global is a British ultra-luxury automotive manufacturer founded in 1913, headquartered in Gaydon, UK. With approximately 3,000 employees and £1.38bn FY2022 revenue, it designs and produces premium sports cars and grand tourers. The company competes in the high-end performance segment against marques like Bentley, Lamborghini, and Ferrari.

Founded
1913
Headquarters
Gaydon, United Kingdom
Employees
~4,800
Annual revenue
~£1.6B
Company website ↗
Track Aston Martin Lagonda Global

We'll let you know when the score moves.

Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.

THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

HOW SINK STAYS INDEPENDENT

Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.