Burger King's sustainability performance is dominated by supply chain deforestation, greenwashing, and a beef-heavy business model that fundamentally conflicts with emissions reduction. RBI reports Scope 3 emissions but uses intensity targets that allow absolute emissions to rise as the chain expands to 40,000+ restaurants. Water impact is entirely unreported.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain and Transparency & Accountability (5/10, 5/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Water Impact (1/10, 1/10).
16 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
11 of 16 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 46 major food service / restaurants brands we've scored, Burger King is tied =42nd of 46, with 1 other.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As Burger King's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Burger King is a global fast-food chain founded in 1954 and headquartered in Miami-Dade County, United States. Owned by Restaurant Brands International, it operates 19,700+ franchised restaurants across 100+ countries, serving primarily flame-grilled beef burgers, chicken, and breakfast items. A major player in the QSR sector.
Peer QSR operator with similar beef-supply chain deforestation exposure and franchise model opacity.
View breakdown →Major beef and poultry processor; supply chain partner for BK; comparable livestock environmental footprint.
View breakdown →Large food corporation with documented deforestation and supply chain governance issues; comparable scale and transition gaps.
View breakdown →Consumer goods conglomerate with similar intensity-based emissions targets and franchise/distributor control limitations.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.