Miller & Carter operates under SBTi-validated net-zero targets with strong operational emissions reporting and renewable energy deployment. However, beef dominance creates a critical supply-chain blind spot: Scope 3 targets are notably weaker than Scope 1&2, nature and water impacts remain largely unquantified, and biodiversity risk is explicitly deferred to 'future collaboration.' Operational waste performance masks upstream vulnerabilities.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Energy Source and Targets & Commitments (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (2/10, 2/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 46 major food service / restaurants brands we've scored, Miller & Carter is tied =4th of 46, with 1 other.
Score history begins 9 April 2026.
As Miller & Carter's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Miller & Carter is a UK-based premium steakhouse chain founded in 1976 and operated by Mitchells & Butlers plc. The company operates over 60 restaurants across the UK and Ireland, specializing in high-end beef dining. As a hospitality business within the food service sector, it faces material exposure to agricultural supply-chain emissions and resource impacts.
Fast-casual beef-heavy competitor; similar supply-chain emissions exposure and weaker Scope 3 trajectory.
View breakdown →Large hospitality chain with comparable TCFD disclosure maturity but higher renewable energy penetration and fewer beef supply risks.
View breakdown →Food/beverage conglomerate with more mature biodiversity and water stewardship commitments despite comparable Scope 3 ambition ceiling.
View breakdown →Food waste redistribution partner cited by Miller & Carter; exemplifies circular economy approaches underexplored in beef supply chain.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.