Toby Carvery's parent company M&B has SBTi-validated net zero targets and renewable electricity across its estate, but brand-level data is absent and supply chain emissions remain unquantified. The April 2025 illegal felling of a 500-year-old protected oak tree in Enfield—confirmed alive by Forestry Commission investigators—exposes failures in environmental governance and site management. Water strategy is missing entirely.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Energy Source and Targets & Commitments (6/10, 6/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (2/10, 2/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 46 major food service / restaurants brands we've scored, Toby Carvery is tied =12th of 46, with 1 other.
Score history begins 9 April 2026.
As Toby Carvery's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Toby Carvery is a British carvery restaurant chain serving roast meat (beef, pork, chicken, turkey) across 153+ sites. Founded in 1976 and headquartered in Birmingham, it is owned by Mitchells & Butlers plc, a major hospitality group. The brand is positioned in the casual dining sector with a traditional family-oriented market.
Large-scale casual dining chain with similar supply chain (meat-heavy), comparable sustainability reporting gaps and scale.
View breakdown →Peer casual dining brand in UK; chicken-focused supply chain with material GHG footprint and water exposure.
View breakdown →Hospitality brand with controversy history; illustrates reputational and governance risks in food-service sector.
View breakdown →Multi-brand casual dining operator with parent-level sustainability reporting; similar brand-level data disclosure gaps.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.